Search for: "State v. Click" Results 3701 - 3720 of 10,825
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Please click here for more information.Other decisions addressing an employee’s alleged misuse of an employer’s electronic equipment include: Fraser v Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 7:47 pm
That opinion lead directly to a change in Florida's trust code that impacts every new trust-related lawsuit in this state [click here]. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm by thejaghunter
Click on Robert Hefner’s illustration for J.B. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Under the TCPA, it is `unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States -- (A) to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using any automatic telephone dialing system . . . [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 2:28 am
This is the abstract:On June 25, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision.Petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the Comptroller's determination.Citing Matter of Bohlen v DiNapoli, 34 NY3d 434, the Appellate Division explained the "Comptroller is vested with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld". [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision.Petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the Comptroller's determination.Citing Matter of Bohlen v DiNapoli, 34 NY3d 434, the Appellate Division explained the "Comptroller is vested with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld". [read post]