Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 61,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Where the proprietor of a trade mark supplies to its authorised distributors items bearing that mark, intended for demonstration to consumers in authorised retail outlets, and bottles bearing the mark from which small quantities can be taken for supply to consumers as free samples, those goods, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, are not put on the market within the meaning of Directive 89/104 and Regulation No 40/94 [= Case C-127/09 Coty Prestige Lancaster v Simex,… [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:43 pm
Rather, the claims simply state that the “compliance mechanism” can perform various functions. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:21 pm
Silver v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am
The Court was looking, however, at a state offense, and so had to look to the interpretation of state courts. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am
The Court was looking, however, at a state offense, and so had to look to the interpretation of state courts. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
At present, the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012, reg 35(15) prohibits the misconduct hearing from stating whether any decision was unanimous or by majority. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:22 am
According to the State, the Supreme Court could not have concluded that “the Pension Clause is absolute” in Felt v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 6:44 am
Bader v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:10 am
State, 331 Md 199 (1993). [read post]
6 May 2014, 1:00 pm
The Court’s decision is inconsistent with any theory of the Establishment Clause except one that gives little meaning to the separation of church and state. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:36 am
Image by Getty Images via DaylifeActress and tabloid queen Lindsay Lohan has filed suit in her native New York against the underwriting and securities brokerage company known for its popular "talking baby" commercials.Lohan, 23, filed a $100 million suit Monday in the state Supreme Court of Nassau County (Lohan v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:58 am
[Behrend v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:14 pm
” He asserts that the meaning of “conclusion of direct review” should be determined by looking to state law. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:51 am
This morning the Supreme Court decided Roberts v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 8:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:21 pm
United States 21-1191Issue: Whether federal district courts exceed their statutory or Article III power by issuing proclamations that their dismissal “counts as a ‘strike’ within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:18 am
Bukkapatnum stated Ms. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 2:09 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 11:36 am
Menghini v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:24 pm
I mean, that’s who wrote the 14th Amendment. [read post]
