Search for: "State v. P. B."
Results 3701 - 3720
of 6,781
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:13 pm
P. 1.540(b). [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:32 am
B. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:11 pm
Carter v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:11 am
One tailored to the particular case must be found, and that can be done only after a discriminating consideration of all information bearing upon an enlightened prediction of the future’ ” (Amodio v Amodio, 70 NY2d 5, 7, quoting Snyder’s Estate v United States, 285 F2d 857, 861). [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 8:21 pm
P. 9(b), the court concluded. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:52 am
PORTER, Individually v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
P. 12(b)(6). . ." [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Baldwin International Radio of Canada, [1934] S.C.R. 570 at p. 574). [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
., v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Weinstein in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
AE 144: Government Notice of Ongoing Command Investigation (Legal Bins) The 9/11 session will follow another hearing in the other Guantanamo capital case, United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm
§414[p][1] [B][i]; 29 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:59 pm
A runs a blog on which B comments, providing an email address that is not displayed with the comment, which A then provides to third party C. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
With a first plea, the claimant asserted invalidity in light of Articles 52(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation EC 40/94 (now Articles 53(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation EC 207/2009 - CTMR), for likelihood of confusion with the earlier national trade mark DANIEL & MAYER MADE IN ITALY, registered by the claimant in Italy in 1981 for goods in Class 25. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
P. 12(b)(1) –lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:22 pm
P. 12(b)(6). [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:10 pm
V 2 b NYC. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court of the United States on February 27 issued its decision in Amgen, Inc. v. [read post]
