Search for: "State v. True" Results 3701 - 3720 of 21,809
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
The Court found Congress's purpose in enacting the NSPA was to `assist the States' efforts to foil the “roving criminal,” whose movement across state lines. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:02 am by Venkat
” He submitted a declaration, but the court dings him because the declaration did not state under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that its contents were true. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:57 am by Jennifer Davis
(R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ¶ 77, supra.). [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the complaint must be afforded a liberal construction, the facts therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference” (Angeli v Barket, 211 AD3d 896, 897; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-6113, and Bazan v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 7:32 pm by Mark Graber
Madison was wrongly decided (or in some classes, that Marbury v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 am by Venkat Balasubramani
“Once it has opened a limited forum … the State must respect the lawful boundaries it has itself set. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:52 pm
  If true, its a major deviation from a consensus view that has developed in the cases and scholarly commentary in favor of the error-cost approach. [read post]