Search for: "Hope v. Hope" Results 3721 - 3740 of 23,996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, it has happened before.In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:00 am by Darryl Hutcheon, Matrix
This week, the Supreme Court hears the appeal in Hotak v London Borough of Southwark, which is joined with the appeals in Johnson v Solihull and Kanu v Southwark. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 7:27 am
  The Regents plaintiffs hoped that the Supreme Court would reverse the dismissal of another scheme liability case, but the Justices disappointed them in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged last month about my certiorari petition in Herrera v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:25 am by Eugene Volokh
But Justice Mitchell is now a controversial figure, ever since he wrote the Alabama Supreme Court's opinion in LePage v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Case Commented On: Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia, 2022 ONSC 1303 (Can LII); 2023 ONCA 476 (CanLII) Intimate partner violence (IPV) takes many forms, all of which cause harm to survivors (who are disproportionately women and children). [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
In a new and interesting working paper, Ilya Somin (George Mason) examines the political backlash against the Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 3:27 pm by Eric
By Eric Goldman My RA Sruli Yellin and I wrote a letter requesting that the California Appellate Court publish its opinion in Redmond v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In the process, the divergent conclusions in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262 (28 March 2007) and the earlier Irish case ofCollins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March 2013) (interpreting the frankly odd section 7 of the Data Protection Act, 1988 (also here)) were rejected. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 2:30 pm
And my keen sense is that this is not the first time that attorney Halpern -- a certified criminal law specialist with the State Bar, by the way -- has gotten his clients into trouble; he's been disciplined at least three separate times by the Bar, and twice has been ineligible to practice law as a result.The panel here at least gives Butz a glimmer of hope that he might not be totally hosed as a result of his attorney's conduct, and that he might possibly be able to file a Rule… [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 1:35 pm
But the (unnamed) majority disagrees, and issued an unpublished order keeping him out yet again.It seems to me like the 64-year old Seaton is just hoping he can stay out forever, or at least as long as he can. [read post]