Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 6,274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm
For example, a university taking and announcing a position on the (contested) issue of how easy it should be for foreign graduate students to obtain visas (something that distinctively affects the university itself—and not just its population—as an institution) seems very different to us than weighing in on the correctness of last year’s Second Amendment ruling by the Supreme Court ruling striking down New York’s public-carry law or the Court’s Dobbs ruling… [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:13 pm
The judge in Novak v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
Parke Davis & Co., 705 P.2d 1001, 1003 (Colo. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
Davies (Del. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 5:48 pm
As an agent points out in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:36 am
While Crawford involved the prototypical ex parte statement — a written statement to police as a result of an interrogation at the station — later decisions, like Davis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
Michael V. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Last week, a class action lawsuit entitled Gary B. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:22 am
Chacón, a law professor at the University of California, Davis, "is fairly intrusive. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(d), the Court now states its findings of fact and conclusions of law and DENIES the Motion to Suppress.U.S. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 1:08 pm
For the first time, the Minnesota Supreme found the law unconstitutional in Fedziuk v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 1:08 pm
For the first time, the Minnesota Supreme found the law unconstitutional in Fedziuk v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 5:31 am
” Defendant sought to assert a counterclaim and cause of action under Judiciary Law § 487. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:59 am
The court held that, under California law (see, e.g., County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 6:09 pm
The White Law Group is a national securities arbitration, securities fraud, and investor protection law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am
The first, Nelson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
” “It is well settled that “[a]n attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479,482 [1st Dept 2018], citingAmbase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
” Miller–Davis Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 7:36 am
Davis Medical Center, Mercy, or Sutter. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:30 am
Saul & Davis v. [read post]
