Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 3721 - 3740 of 119,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2008, 5:54 pm
The license may or may not be valid, and EA and Mr. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Several states, cities, counties and non-profit organizations, including the State of New York, filed suit. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm by Adam Kielich
This month the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments on Sandifer v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:52 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Judge Walker has ordered that the stay of entry of judgment in Perry v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 8:02 pm
Guantanamo was chosen by the Bush administration in the belief that the writ of habeas corpus could not reach outside the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 7:07 am
Like some NGO's, state governments may sometimes promote a more generalized public interest in the environment. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am by Andrew Hamm
” On May 10, the Supreme Court Historical Society and the Supreme Court Fellows Alumni Association host a “Look Back” at Gideon v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In giving the lead majority judgment Lord Mance stated that although the present situation may not have been foreseen by the legislature, it is not a reason for reading into clear legislation a specific exemption which would not reflect the scope of any exemption in EU law. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals rules that a plaintiff may have a claim under the New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws that his former employer discriminated against him because of his perceived sexual orientation. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:04 am by msW1Ld
In letters dated October 27, 2009 (State AG Letter re HR 3190; State AG Letter re S 148), 41 state attorneys general wrote to Congress asking them to overrule Leegin Creative Leather Product, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
This is the first in a series of posts on United States v. [read post]