Search for: "P. v. Long" Results 3721 - 3740 of 7,170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
For instance, back in 1985, Robert Levinson complained of a contract with the Eckerd Foundation for the management of the Okeechobee School for Boys in which “[v]irtually every” contract item concerned input activities and pertained to administrative/operational functions. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:03 am by Glenn
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:38 pm by Douglas
Os rolezinhos provocam pânicos (ou seria terror?) [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Not too long ago we were asked what we thought about warning claims involving medication guides. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Simon Fodden
One of the oddest has to be the prose of P. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:46 am by Doorey
Test for Granting an Injunction The Judge applies the well known test for granting an injunction set out in the 1994 SCC case RJR MacDonald v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am by Marty Lederman
  (The brief at several places asserts that federal law requires the Greens or the employers "to provide specific contraceptives" to employees (p. 15; see also pp. 34, 41). [read post]