Search for: "People v. Lines" Results 3721 - 3740 of 12,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2022, 6:15 pm
For example, if you were caught taking drugs across state lines or the arresting officer was a federal officer, you may face federal charges. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
 And as always, please drop a line or a comment if I've missed one. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:21 am by Jack Bogdanski
It doesn't to me.Bottom line: Things are not going to get noticeably better on the streets of Portland for a long, long time. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The first category of cases usually gets more attention than the second, as more people are interested in the rights of flag burners than issues relating to the separation of powers. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
The review focuses "largely on the controversial decision issued by the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 6:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Employers can get pretty creative when it comes to discriminating against people who file discrimination charges with the EEOC. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
Hartung In the first part of this series posted last week, I discussed the majority and concurring opinions in Athena v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 5:11 pm
.: i) 'Kitchen Amenities Fee;' ii) 'Telephone Lines;' iii) 'Telecom Handset;' iv) 'Local Telephone;' v) Internet activation and access charges; vi) taxes; and vii) penalties". [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:57 am by Florian Mueller
Judge Alsup held that more than 7,000 lines of declaring Java API code were not protected by copyright. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:35 am by Bill
I'm holding some papers in the ABC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 6:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Some people equate this figure with the “poverty line” although Statistics Canada expressly states that this is not a measure of poverty. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
” Private hearing and anonymity The Judge emphasised that the information in this case plainly concerns sexual activity between two people, taking place in private. [read post]