Search for: "Peters v. Peters"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 7,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2010, 5:41 am
NO-FAULT – TIMING OF FOLLOW-UP VERIFICATION – INSURANCE LAW § 5106(A) – 11 NYCRR § 65-3.6(B) Perfect Point Acupuncture, P.C. a/a/o Jocelyn Louis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
Carnwath LJ approved Peter Smith J's statement at [17] of Hanoman v Southwark that: The wording of s. 124(1) could not, in my mind be plainer: they shall give a decision which is either in favour of accepting or denying the right to buy. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:48 am
The Federal Court decision in Thaler v Commissioner of Patents” analyses the reasoning of Beach J in the Thaler decision at first instance, noting that this decision is the first judicial consideration in Australia relating to the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the Australian patent system. [read post]
30 May 2009, 11:24 pm
The Case of CMS v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:55 pm
Hat Tip to fellow tweeter @Taxbod for drawing attention to this classic from Peter Cook…. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 6:54 pm
In Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:45 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Oracle v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Symposium on Peter Shane’s “Democracy’s Chief Executive”: Peter Shane’s book Democracy’s Chief Executive explores how the rise of expansive executive authority and how it does—and does not—align with constitutionalism. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:53 pm
Legislative Update NSSTA - Eric Vaughn: Washington Update SSP - Roy Franco: HR 1063 Government Benefits NSSTA MSA Panel -Toni Warbington; Doug Brand; David Korch; David Hayes Special Needs Trusts - Jay Sangerman SSP Liability MSAs - Jason Lazarus; Roy Franco; Mark Pololizio; Doug Shaw Liens Panel - Roy Franco; Tevra Johnson Recommended resources S2P2J Chapter 15 - "Government Benefits and Structured Settlements" S2 wiki - "Government Benefits" … [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 3:32 pm
The Delaware case is Julia Haart v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm
Silbergeld, Peter D. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 4:15 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Marshall discussed the sale of genuine goods with the barcoded data removed constituted a trade mark infringement in the US, reviewing Davidoff's successful COOL WATER action against CVS (here) and the bizarre manner of its expression.Dr Peter Ruess (International School of Management, Frankfurt) then examined the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling in Court C-57/08 COPAD v Dior. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
V. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:30 pm
” State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 3:41 pm
In Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art Foundation v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:13 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:45 am
As a former federal prosecutor, Peter was dismayed by the recent rulings in U.S. v. [read post]
