Search for: "Powers v. Thomas"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 5,381
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
Wickard and similar cases remain precedents which no one except Justice Thomas is willing to overrule, but they are not bases from which even broader uses of the Commerce Power can be extrapolated. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
At Verdict, Neil Buchanan argues that the majority was right to hold that the mandate falls under Congress’s taxing power. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:05 pm
See generally Knox v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm
Perhaps the most egregiously political deviation from precedent since Bush v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:49 am
There was one other decision, Miller v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:55 pm
Even though Lawrence v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:24 am
Roberts cast the deciding fifth vote, but he did it on the basis of the power to tax, not regulate commerce. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:19 am
The opinion of Justice Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito looks like parts of it were once a majority opinion. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am
Thomas J. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:05 am
I was likely not alone as the interest over National Federation of Independent Business, et al v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:40 am
Filburn (1942) and United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am
Back in 2005, in Gonzalez v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:38 am
Four judges, Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Alito and Thomas, did not find the 'individual mandate' to be a valid exercise of taxing powers by Congress. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:24 am
In a series of separate opinions, Justice Thomas has adopted this approach and rejected the contemporary notion of “purposes and objects” preemption. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:13 am
Roberts was 50 when he became Chief Justice in 2005, Justice Thomas was just 43 when he was appointed in 1991. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
Chief Justice John Marshall wrote almost two hundred years ago in Gibbons v. [read post]
