Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 3721 - 3740
of 6,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm
(Boorstein v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:17 am
Donuts over .coach; c. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c) 4., commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084 [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
” Over at Alison Frankel’s On The Case blog at Thomson Reuters, Erin Geiger Smith previews Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
The Court said what it meant and meant what is said in CCH v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:39 am
By Glen C. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Oracle's motion is moot. 23 C. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:52 pm
§9:2800.57(C). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
As a quick refresher, FBT Productions (Eminem’s company) brought a lawsuit against UMG to determine whether record labels must account for digital music downloads as licenses or sales. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 10:52 pm
In Bowes v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 10:52 pm
In Bowes v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:16 am
United Fabricare Supply, Inc. v. 3Hanger Supply Company, Inc., 2012 WL 2449916 (C.D. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:56 am
Published on July 2 in the forfeiture case of United States Of America v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:35 pm
Geraci v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
On June 28, 2012, the Third Circuit became the first Federal court of appeals to address the secondary payer rights of Medicare Advantage Organizations (also known as Medicare Part C plans). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
On June 28, 2012, the Third Circuit became the first Federal court of appeals to address the secondary payer rights of Medicare Advantage Organizations (also known as Medicare Part C plans). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am
Although there is a provision in the Data Protection Act that allows for interference with an individual’s right to data protection in connection with legal proceedings (see section 35), the ECJ jurisprudence is clear that such interference must be both necessary and proportionate (see the decisions of the ECJ in Case C-73/07 Satakunnen [2008] and Case C-92/09 Schecke v Land Hessen [2010], paras 72-77). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
However, recognizing that the proposed Amendment remedies are merely a short-term solution, Part V, also reprinted below, questions the compatibility of speculative invoicing with copyright law’s underlying goals and purposes, and makes some arguments in favor of systemic reform of copyright law more generally, an issue with which Questioncopyright.org is intimately familiar. ... [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:19 am
Platt & Munk Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:10 am
El argumento del brócoli y la cláusula de comercio Esta nota del NYT explica cómo fue que el vegetal se convirtió en todo un símbolo de la lógica de la pendiente descendente. [read post]
