Search for: "State v. Dominic" Results 3721 - 3740 of 4,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
A simple hypothetical drawn from the facts in San Antonio v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:05 am by Yvonne Dutton
For the first time in the ICC’s history, in September 2019 a Pre-Trial Chamber recognized charges of gender persecution in Prosecutor v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
  Indeed, Masimo recovered $134 million in a patent infringement case against their dominant rivals, who had promptly infringed Masimo's patent after the product's introduction. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Guest Author
An independent forum for ex post contestation is a valuable tool to guard against arbitrariness or domination based on epistemic advantages, which may proliferate in the administrative state.[12] In Canada, judicial review on certain grounds is so important that it is constitutionally protected.[13]   I fear that common good constitutionalism, like other modern theories of the administrative state that take on a hue of political constitutionalism, may… [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
The state of things in totalitarian countries may induce us to revise this opinion. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 9:28 am by Eugene Volokh
Phillips: Yesterday in oral argument in ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:16 am by Michael Geist
Moreover, a unanimous court dismissed claims of economic harm from the copying (with echoes of the recent Georgia State University fair use decision) and in the SOCAN v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Kristian Soltes
The bill would ban all mergers and acquisitions for companies with over $100 billion in values, the release stated. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:26 pm by William L. Anderson, Esq.
  Chart: Florida Medical Cannabis Market Surges Ahead, With Five Companies Dominating, Marijuana Business Daily, May 7, 2019. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
At this stage of the litigation, however, the court denied the employees’ request to enjoin the employer from further communications with the absent class members (Slavkov v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm by David Bernstein
It’s another for the government that runs a massive special interest state to either decide who gets to speak (e.g., academics, newspaper editors, bloggers, “public interest groups” [update: and other members of the “cognitive elite,” whose average views diverge dramatically from public median]) and who does not (for-profit corporations and unions [update: or just ordinary citizens who band together via a PAC]), or to decide what the content of one’s… [read post]