Search for: "State v. Washington"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 17,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm
Arkansas Law Review Examines the Lessons of Korematsu v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:08 pm
Sutter, AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:30 am
The Washington Post reports that this morning, the Court asked both parties in Kiyemba v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:00 am
She previously authored The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program and Hansberry v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:01 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision in the closely watched case of Sackett v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:05 am
Yesterday in De Leon v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974; Administrative Procedure Act) United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
Women First OB/GYN Associates, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:39 am
Smith Communications, LLC v Washington County, 2014 WL 2450067 (WD Ark 6/2/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Wireless Communications [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
Washington). [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 am
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s sleeper case of the term, Reed v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
" And "testimony" in turn, as expressed by the Supreme Court, "is typically '[a] solemn declaration or affirmation made for the purpose of establishing or proving some fact" (Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36 [2004]). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:20 am
Washington, D.C. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Briefly: In a Washington Post opinion piece, Leah Litman argues that President Donald Trump’s Tuesday executive order – which seeks to exclude undocumented immigrants from the 2020 census count used to determine congressional representation – confirms that the administration’s arguments before the Supreme Court in last year’s census case, Department of Commerce v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:59 am
[Beck, Drug & Device Law and more; Jonah Knobler, Washington Legal Foundation] Money didn’t go into state treasury: “Oklahoma Lawmakers not so Happy About Purdue Pharma Settlement” [Sean Murphy, Insurance Journal, more] “Nevada AG’s old law firm can make up to $350 million on his opioid lawsuit” [Daniel Fisher, Legal Newsline] “List of firms handling Louisiana’s opioid lawsuit balloons to 17, including politically connected… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:29 am
In Sosa v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:40 pm
Under Strickland v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:17 am
Washington prejudice standard applies; whether 21 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:48 pm
" United States v. [read post]
