Search for: "State v. York" Results 3721 - 3740 of 32,734
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” Indeed, in Doctor v New York State Office of Alcoholism & Substance Abuse Services, 112 A.D.3d 1020, the court said that hearsay evidence alone may constitute substantial evidence in an administrative hearing.In contrast, hearsay testimony is typically barred in a criminal trial. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:57 am by Cormac Early
Perry and United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:35 am
Limit on questioning by hearing officerBretton v State of New York, App. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
Employee's ADA claim for damages survives promotion to a higher grade positionMatter of Jochelman v New York State Banking Dept., 2008 NY Slip Op 09267, decided on November 25, 2008, Appellate Division, First Department After the New York State Banking Department denied Irving Jochelman a promotion to the position of Principal Bank Examiner I, Jochelman sued Supreme Court granted Banking's motion to dismiss his petition because Jochelman had… [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:19 am by Stephen Bilkis
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:04 am
Later Otero asked a New York State Supreme Court justice to direct the Department to rescind his resignation. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:24 am by Richard Primus
  Right now, there is a pending suit in state court in New York raising that next question.The suit, Zervos v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 4:59 am
Appeal dismissed because of a procedural misstepMatter of Rumman v Duane Reade, 2009 NY Slip Op 05968, decided on July 21, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights adopted the finding of an Administrative Law Judge that Dilruba Rumman failed to demonstrate that the reasons given by her former employer for its terminating her employment was a "pretext for unlawful discrimination" and dismissed the… [read post]