Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 6,214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2013, 3:07 pm
The case was Ang v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:44 pm
The People were permitted to call an additional witness, DD, who had been in one of defendant's classes but had moved to another State more than a year before the investigation into the present charges began. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
That all changed once Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
But under cross-examination, [he] conceded he was unsure how much time passed before Peoples entered. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 12:45 pm
CFPs:Forced Migration Review [info]- Articles sought for a theme issue on "Afghanistan’s Displaced People: 2014 and Beyond." [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm
People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 11:03 am
Officials Respond to EU Concerns Over #SafeHarbor Data Transfer Program http://ow.ly/rR9D2 #EUDataP EU-US ‘Safe Harbour’ under threat as US castigates EU Parliament over Snowden http://ow.ly/rTXwR #safeharbor #EUDataP Facebook posts and Free Speech Police Officer’s Facebook Post Criticizing Her Boss Isn’t Protected Speech Graziosi v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm
The Court, interpreting People v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:03 pm
See Barrow v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:57 pm
[v] (The apparent search for pockets is reflected in the naming of third parties as well. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 12:05 am
Does that cross the line? [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 3:54 pm
Of course, I realize that some people hate Smith v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
It is to be noted that the key is whether the defendant has been afforded an opportunity to refute those aggravating factors which may have negatively influenced the court as held in People v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:49 am
Jones v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
Arnold and United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 11:24 am
people via a message that has obscene, lewd or profane (??) [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[33] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no real margin of error, and the cost of error can be death. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:23 am
Accolade, Sony v. [read post]
