Search for: "US Inventor"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 7,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2007, 2:23 am
Se-Pill is co-inventor of U.S. 6,921,632, issued July 26, 2005, and titled Human embryonic stem cells derived from frozen-thawed embryo. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 6:21 am
Further, no reputable patent attorney would tell an inventor that he/she could patent an idea that was embodied in an expired or lapsed patent. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:29 am
That approach is useful for inquiries such as literal infringement or novelty, but it’s of less use when conducting other types of patentability or validity analyses. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 2:25 pm
While it is possible for an inventor to draft a patent claims themselves, it is almost impossible for an inventor without patent drafting experience to draft a good, let alone a great, patent claim. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 3:32 am
Dow:When the inventors applied for the patent at issue, they had sequenced one gene coding for one enzyme, using a test purportedly capable of finding other, similar genes. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 1:05 am
In contrast to the current approach in the US (IPKat), the EPO permits functional genus claiming (IPKat, IPKat). [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:55 am
” Knorrinvolved a telephone call, in which two co-inventors,Buergin and Pearson, discussed an invention, and whichwas overheard by a third party, Rutkowski. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:49 pm
Eight inventors are listed on this IP:Kornbluh, Roy D. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:59 am
The Federal Circuit began its analysis by explaining the "strong" presumption "not readily overcome" that claim terms not using the term "means" are not subject to § 112 ¶ 6. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:18 am
• Second medical use patentsThe new Patents Act sets forth the possibility of patenting substances or compositions already known for their use as medicaments of new therapeutic applications. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:24 am
The written description “must clearly allow persons of ordinary skill in the art to recognize that [the inventor] invented what is claimed. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 12:45 pm
In addition, the prosecuting attorney for ArrivalStar’s patents is the attorney-inventor of Eclipse IP’s patents. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:10 am
Recognizing the importance of stimulating innovation, the Framers of the Constitution authorized the United States Congress (Congress) “[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
” The legislative intent of the patent system is to provide an incentive to advance useful technologies by enabling inventors to benefit economically. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 5:53 pm
That holds even if the inventor can prove that he or she completed the invention before the patent, publication, sale, or public use. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:25 am
AIA has been criticized by many as being overly burdensome to small independent inventors, will increase the number of provisional applications being made to the USPTO and would allow the Appropriations Committee to unduly control the fees generated by the USPTO. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
Barr Laboratories, Inc. and Mylan Pharma (Patent Docs) (Patently-O) Omnicef (Cefdinir) – US: CAFC on whether a product-by-process claim is infringed by an identical product made by different process: Abbott Labs v Sandoz (IP Frontline) Pertussis vaccines – UK: EWHC dismisses Medeva appeal against pertussis vaccines SPCs refusal (The SPC Blog) Plavix (Clopidogrel) – Canada: Adding some obvious flexibility: Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc (IP Osgoode) Rapamune… [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
The barely one-week old landmark US Supreme Court decision in KSR v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
In particular, that output data of a simulation may have a ‘potential technical effect’ – a technical effect that would be produced when the data is used according to an intended technical use. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:50 pm
You’re sort of giving “on sale to the public” its meaning, but those are not the words used by Congress. [read post]
