Search for: "United States v. May"
Results 3721 - 3740
of 47,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2010, 8:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 1:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 4:00 pm
United States (06-1509), United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
Although in some instances there may be manufacturers who require inputs from abroad, and in some others constituents may produce for foreign markets, for the most part the members focus on what is produced within their states and for a domestic market. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 11:44 pm
BNA's United States Law Week reported in Vol. 75, No. 33 (Mar. 6, 2007) on the case Swiger v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
A final certification may be made by a secretary of a United States embassy or legation; by a consul general, vice consul, or consular agent of the United States; or by a diplomatic or consular official of the foreign country assigned or accredited to the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:34 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:30 am
In Bard v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:04 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am
Given similar concerns about identifying "religion," "churches," and "the press," it may be that church-state scholars can and will have something to add to thinking and writing about the Press Clause. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 6:13 am
Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians: Shingle Springs Opening Brief Here are some excerpts: Because Indian tribes are sovereigns preexisting the United States and its Constitution, they may be sued only where the tribe or Congress unequivocally expresses consent to suit. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 9:57 am
In health care fraud trial concerning false billings, computer records of physician's drug company purchases were admissible as business record under FRE 803(6), in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 2:00 pm
Harlan Protass just alerted me to, and blogs here, a remarkable district court opinion United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:04 am
In aggravated sexual abuse of a child trial, trial court was not required to hold a Daubert reliability hearing before admitting expert testimony by a university professor of pediatrics concerning the characteristics of minor victims of abuse; trial court has discretion to decide whether a Daubert hearing is required, in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:03 am
We reported last week that the Supreme Court of the United States had decided the fate of the Ninth Circuit's decision in Dukes v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:57 pm
" In Cosmetic Ideas, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:04 am
United States v. [read post]
