Search for: "DANIEL v. DANIEL"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 8,751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2010, 10:00 am
Le député UMP Daniel Fasquelle, professeur de droit, a défendu la fusion avocats-CPI en souhaitant rétablir les articles supprimés en Commission : Les professionnels de notre pays sont beaucoup trop dispersés face aux grosses machines anglo-saxonnes, qui, malheureusement, viennent trop souvent prendre des parts de marché sur le marché parisien du droit des affaires. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:49 pm
Doe v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
The Court issued one decision yesterday, in United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 5:07 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:32 am
In Pyeritz v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:52 am
Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 7:02 am
The decision is Raemond Ellis v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
Daniels granted Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment and his petition for the repatriation of the children to Israel. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
Daniels granted Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment and his petition for the repatriation of the children to Israel. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:15 am
The plaintiffs in the suit are Richard Schaeffer, Shaf Holdings LLC and Schaeffer Holdings LLC; the defendants are Deborah Kessler and “her husband, Daniel Kessler. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:14 am
Defendants’ other [*2]arguments present disputed factual issues concerning the standard of care and proximate cause that are not properly resolved on a motion to dismiss the complaint (see Urias v Daniel P. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:19 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:30 am
“Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel Mendez, J.), entered February 22, 2017, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a stay of eviction, and order, same court and Justice, entered August 4, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendants David Kaminsky, Danielle Kaminsky (together, the Kaminsky defendants), Jeffrey Asher, Robinson Brog Leinwand, Green, Genovese & Gluck P.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am
As I noted in my preview of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:02 am
By Eric Goldman Philbrick v. eNom, Inc., 2009 WL 152127 (D.N.H. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
Indeed, the majority opinion doesn’t contain a single mention of last month’s NRA v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 1:02 pm
Pietrangelo v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:39 am
The Supreme Court, in Imbler v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v Horton, 9 AD3d 503 [3rd Dept 2004]… [read post]
