Search for: "Grant v. People"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 16,987
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Public Records, Public University and Sexual Assault – Which Laws Hold Sway?: By S. Dean Michaux, JD
24 Jun 2020, 8:37 am
” The trial court granted Plaintiff’s request related to UNC-CH employees. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
If equitable tax treatment between similarly-earning joint filers is also granted as preferable, then we may add the goal of couple’s neutrality.[7] For example, a neutral tax code would tax a couple earning $100,000 the same whether both filers earned $50,000 or one filer earned $100,000. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:30 pm
The People, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
A quick Google search brings up references to at least seven different actions commenced across Canada in 2019 by various representative plaintiffs on behalf of proposed classes of people exposed to glyphosate. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
A quick Google search brings up references to at least seven different actions commenced across Canada in 2019 by various representative plaintiffs on behalf of proposed classes of people exposed to glyphosate. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 5:01 am
This is, by the way, the reason people who owe tax but are unable to pay are advised to file the return to avoid additional penalties for failure to file.A recent Tax Court case, Strashny v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:52 am
CFPB and Trump v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 06584-20 Fair Play for Women v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 02638-20 A woman v Mail Online, 3 Harassment (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 1 Accuracy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 6 Children (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), Resolved0 IPSO mediation 01321-20 A Man v Sunday Life, 11 Victims of sexual assault… [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 6:07 am
People may be living in small apartments as they reorganize their lives. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm
(Again, I'll presume familiarity with Texas v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:07 pm
Beach Communications, Inc. (1993) (quoting Williamson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm
The constitution, therefore, takes it for granted that, as the people have the right, they will also have the sense, to use arms, whenever the necessity of the case justifies it. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:17 am
(Laake v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 12:01 am
We start with an important legal case Trecarrel v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 12:01 am
We start with an important legal case Trecarrel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:40 pm
Food and Drug Administration announced the revocation of its emergency use authorization for chloroquine and hydroxychlorine (HCQ).[1] The FDA had originally granted the emergency use authorization for HCQ, on March 28, 2020, but its continued review found that the drug was “unlikely to be effective at treating COVID-19” and the potential risks of HCQ use outweigh any potential benefits. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm
For example, the Ninth Circuit held that the Fifth Circuit erred in Texas v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 5:53 pm
Twenty-six states joined Texas in the litigation (United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:52 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:12 pm
This principle, first announced by the Supreme Court in 1943's SEC v. [read post]