Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 4,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:48 pm
While making said observation, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Naresh Charan Das Gupta's case (supra) quoted the observation of Lord Penzance in the decision reported as Hall v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:05 am
The Ministers are Oliver Dowden MP (Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport); Caroline Dinenage MP (Minister for Digital and Culture) and Baroness Williams (Lords Minister, Home Office). [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:06 am
See you in the House of Lords! [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:10 pm
Journalists must be able to perform their work without fear of intimidation or censure by the state. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 1:36 pm
The inaugural lecture was presented by Lord Lawrence Collins of Mapesbury (Former Justice at the United Kingdom Supreme Court) on the “Use and Abuse of Comity in International Litigation”. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:38 am
The Ministers are Oliver Dowden MP (Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport); Caroline Dinenage MP (Minister for Digital and Culture) and Baroness Williams (Lords Minister, Home Office). [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:52 am
Haack at 6 (citing Tehan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Counsel also relied extensively on the judgment of the UK Supreme Court (particularly Lords Mance and Collins) in Dallah Real Estate v Government of Pakistan, which we have discussed here, to suggest that a court must always have jurisdiction to examine matters which are “fundamental” to an arbitration, such as arbitrability of the dispute, whether there was a valid arbitration agreement etc. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court released its decision on the centuries-old Alien Tort Statute (ATS) in Kiobel v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 11:24 am
In Epperson v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:57 am
Maintaining this sometimes uneasy balance is the basic task of a democratic state. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 1:38 am
Such is the state of modern British housing. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 2:20 pm
The IPKat's excellent and scholarly friend Norman Siebrasse tells him that he has recently become aware of a recent Canadian decision, Nazerali v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:02 am
In Lord Osunfarian Xodus v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:33 am
In other words, Judge Kopf’s post of the 9th Circuit oral argument in Baca v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:31 am
Supreme Court ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:02 am
If it did, then it would be a trap for the unwary in all the 26 other EU member states. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 3:43 am
In Vestergaard Frandsen and others v. [read post]
