Search for: "Matter of G. C. ," Results 3741 - 3760 of 4,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Others argue that it should be extended to apply to all types of claims a Word did not find any entries for your table of contents.nd clauses in contract law, not just those involving c breach of contract. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Boaz, No. 07-3918 Conviction for firearms possession is affirmed where: 1) district court did not err in determining defendant's prior Arkansas felony conviction qualified as a predicate offense under 18 U.S.C. sec. 922(g)(1); and 2) preponderance of the evidence was the correct standard for determining that defendant had three predicate violent felonies for purposes of 18 U.S.C. sec. 924(e). [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 3:55 pm by Michael Lowe
Code §71.0221(c) (emphasis added): A casual acquaintanceship or ordinary fraternization in a business or social context does not constitute a “dating relationship” under Subsection (b). [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 6:28 pm by Michael Lowe
Misdemeanor Up to $2499 in Consumer Insurance Fraud For example, the individual will only face misdemeanor charges for small fraud claims: Class C misdemeanor if the value of the claim is less than $100; Class B misdemeanor if the value of the claim is $100 or more but less than $750; Class A misdemeanor if the value of the claim is $750 or more but less than $2,500. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Understanding the risk that a judgment for wilful IP infringement may be discharged in bankruptcy (IP Spotlight) As a litigator, Judge Sotomayor handled many trade mark matters (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Obama Administration confirms support for continuing ACTA negotiations (Michael Geist) (Intellectual Property Watch)   US General – Decisions District Court N D Illinois orders production of allegedly privileged documents after in… [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a unanimous 29-page opinion authored by Associate Justice Carol Corrigan, and filed on March 30, 2017, the California Supreme Court held the City of Newport Beach’s EIR for a large mixed-use development project proposed on a 400-acre coastal zone site failed to comply with CEQA. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In principle this Decision also applies to the present case; however, it has to be taken into account that, according to general intertemporal principles, the correct course of the proceedings before the RS has to be assessed on the basis of the legal situation existing at the relevant point in time (in this context, see decisions G 1/07 [1.1] and J 10/07 [1.2]). [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
§ §341, 343(b), 343(c), 343(d), 343(e), 343(f), 343(g), 343(h), 343(i), 343(k), 343(q), or 343(r)) relating to food.Drug and device companies don't have that problem, which - as we explained in our prior post - is why the California Supreme Court had to jump through all the hoops it did to avoid preemption.So with this point in mind, we look at the defendants' certiorari petition in Albertsons/Farm Raised Salmon. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
The ARB dismissed the petition, noting that the ALJ’s decision would be the final decision of the Department in the matter. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm by Schachtman
The discovery of expert witnesses who have conducted statistical analyses poses difficult problems for lawyers. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
As noted in yesterday's post and the comments thereto, one purpose of virtual reality is to escape from a less-than-ideal reality. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
” Counsel for petitioner are  Rob Owen (Owen & Roundtree), as well as Skadden Aarps’ attorneys Douglas G Robinson & Maria Cruz Melendez. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
 Saad Siddiqui Team Members: Zach Benoit (2L), Michael Pesin (2L), Debbie Robbins (3L), Hanna Shoshany (3L) The competition involved a defendant, Melbourne G. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
As a general matter, such a claim could only go forward if there is an invasion (or imminent invasion) of the plaintiff's property rights, or if the case presents an analogous concrete dispute involving the plaintiff's rights or duties regarding his own property. [read post]