Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 6,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2015, 8:19 am
Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians Perhaps the most immediate beneficiary of the Bay Mills win in the Supreme Court, which persuaded the State of Michigan to seek another route to fighting Sault Tribe’s Lansing casino proposal. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Snyder (Michigan), and Bourke v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 12:02 am
” In that case (Superior Consulting) the employer conducted business in 43 states and several foreign countries, which supported the court's conclusion that the noncompetition agreement's unlimited geographical scope to be reasonable. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 7:13 am
Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Vance v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:10 am
The court accepted Wal-Mart’s argument that Michigan’s medical marijuana law does not regulate private employment; rather, it merely provides a potential affirmative defense to criminal prosecution or other adverse action by the state. [read post]
6 May 2010, 10:03 am
In a decision released Monday in Renico v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:36 pm
Supreme Court’s 1938 decision in Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am
Michigan v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 5:28 am
The statute of limitations, based upon state law’s most appropriate statute of limitations, was six years. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
’s (“Funeral Homes”) motion to dismiss the complaint in EEOC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am
§ Petitioner’s reply brief Title: Weishuhn v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:33 am
Both Garre and Mahoney served in Republican administrations and, perhaps more significantly, Mahoney successfully defended the University of Michigan law school’s affirmative action program in Grutter v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
The Sixth Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:12 am
The Eleventh Circuit wasted little time in applying AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
The same is true for today’s cigarette smugglers. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:11 am
Yesterday SCOTUSblog’s symposium on same-sex marriage featured a contribution from Professor Steve Sanders of the University of Michigan Law School, who argues the Court should hold California’s Proposition 8 unconstitutional “to protect the integrity of thousands of existing marriages . . . against the coercive power of states that believe heteronormativity is so important a policy that it justifies not only banning new same-sex marriages, but… [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
Michigan State Bd. of Education, 379 F. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
Khouli et al.Photo: ICEThe US District Court for the Eastern District of New York held a status conference in the criminal matter of United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am
On March 5, 2012, Burgos filed a motion asking the judge to reconsider the ruling in “light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in” U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 5:56 pm
(The petition is No. 07-468, American Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
