Search for: "STATE v. SMITH" Results 3741 - 3760 of 10,047
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am by Joshua Thompson and Ralph Kasarda
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
  Here, much to our liking, the court cited the recent Tenth Circuit ruling in Caplinger v. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Smith and Desmond King, America’s New Racial Battle Lines: Protect versus Repair (University of Chicago Press, 2024).Alexandra Filindra In America’s New Racial Battle Lines: Protect v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
On Mr B's aplication for a stay until determination of his planning appeal, this did not stand a realistic prospect of success Against the argued precedents of South Buckinghamshire District Council v Smith [2006] EWHC 281 QB, South Cambridgeshire DC v Price [2008] EWHC 1234 (Admin) and Brentwood Borough Council v Ball [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB), where injunctions had been refused pending planning appeals, there was the fact that these all concerned injunction… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
On Mr B's aplication for a stay until determination of his planning appeal, this did not stand a realistic prospect of success Against the argued precedents of South Buckinghamshire District Council v Smith [2006] EWHC 281 QB, South Cambridgeshire DC v Price [2008] EWHC 1234 (Admin) and Brentwood Borough Council v Ball [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB), where injunctions had been refused pending planning appeals, there was the fact that these all concerned injunction… [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(a)(5) provides that a declarant is "unavailable" if he is absent from the hearing and the proponent of a statement has been unable to procure the declarant's attendance (or in the case of a hearsay exception... [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:08 am by tom
UNITED STATES 09-1302    BOEING COMPANY v. [read post]