Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 3741 - 3760 of 21,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2023, 11:00 pm
”And in response to the defendant’s objection as to the timeliness of the litigation, the AD2 thought that while the plaintiffs may have missed the window to bring the claim under a New York State “theft of equity” statute, [Real Property Law § 265-a], they timely brought their common-law fraud claim within the governing six-year period [CPLR 213[8]].Now there’s no voiding that ….# # #DECISIONR. v K & Y. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
”Since J.C. wasn't able to rebut the franchisors’ showing that they “lacked the requisite control over the manner in which Plaza Toyota serviced vehicles,” the AD2 thought the denial of the dismissal motion was an error and reversed; dismissing all claims and cross-claims that had been asserted against those defendants.Interestingly, the failure to introduce a copy of the dealership agreement didn’t negate the franchisors’ entitlement to relief, nor did their… [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:46 pm by Florian Mueller
Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Samsung's petition for an injunction rehearing relating to the second Apple v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:33 am
Subscription required for online access: STATE DECISIONS: Algarin v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
  The AG’s hypothetical complaint would have been based on the state DTPA, so a four part test from Singh v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:41 am by Howard Knopf
" In Canada, this means the liability set forth in s. 27(2) of the Act that deals with such matters as sale, distribution, and importation. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 2:50 am
Trump’s tough talk with Iran comes as he continues to face fierce criticism over his meeting last week with President Vladimir V. [read post]
31 May 2014, 1:34 pm by Michael Lowe
Under the CSA, there are five classification schedules (Schedules I – V) for their regulation, with Schedule I being the most restrictive and Schedule V the least. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am by Conor McEvily
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 2:26 pm by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
This week the Ontario Court of Appeal released a much awaited decision in the case of Westerhof v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:55 am
” Going on to state that “this transaction would have happened with or without [Plaintiff]”. [read post]