Search for: "State v. English"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 6,459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
The social events and legislative history leading to the enactment and promulgation of the NSL as a national law applied to the HKSAR under BL 18 have been summarised in HKSAR v Lai Chee Ying, ante. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
The parent company of the group is an English company, based in Windsor. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:25 am
In doing so, it quoted a 2006 US Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:25 am
In doing so, it quoted a 2006 US Supreme Court case, Davis v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:39 am
Johannah also previously interned with the federal government at the State Department in 2018. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
"Member States Discuss Key Copyright Issues" is the title of a recent media release from the World Intellectual Property Organization. [read post]
20 May 2012, 11:47 pm
Related posts: Franzina on Negrepontis v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 5:42 am
For my thoughts on English-only rules, see EEOC settlement highlights red flags for English-only policies. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:05 am
THE COURT: You’re good with English? [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 1:12 pm
The case of Obrey v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:57 am
On November 9, 2009, Safety Nat’l Casualty Corp. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
As I previously noted in People v Gobrick, 510 Mich 1029, 1029 (2022) (WELCH, J., concurring), “lexicographers and the authors of English style guides have long changed practices to reflect the evolution of the English lexicon. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:37 am
In State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Bear with me dear reader, as I recognise the gravity of disgreeing with all of Floyd LJ, Ryder LJ, Arden LJ and Arnold J.But not everyonedoes ...The problem this Kat has is that they all rely on the subjective state of the infringer, whether it is subjective intent, or knowledge, even if the knowledge is constructive knowledge. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 10:08 am
Petitioners point to the historical rejection of the English "manner of manufacture" in favor of the broader Constitutional "and useful Arts" as support for protection of processes being a seminal Constitutional right. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 12:38 pm
” – the English abstract reads as follows: Friedrich Carl v. [read post]
