Search for: "State v. Favors" Results 3741 - 3760 of 37,557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 * In Hall v Environmental Conservation, 235 AD2d 757, the Appellate Division upheld an arbitrator's award in favor of the employee after Environmental Conservation boycotted the arbitration because if believed that the employee was not entitled to arbitrate the dispute.The Milan decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2017/2017_05508.htm [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:05 am by Nassiri Law
Although that decision was affirmed by the appellate court, the state supreme court in its review of Adams v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Plaintiff, acting pro se in this appeal, challenged a federal district court's granting his former employer, the Syracuse Regional Airport Authority [SRAA], summary judgment in response to Plaintiff's allegations of unlawful discrimination and retaliation.The United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, noting that summary judgment is proper "only when, construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-movant'" and "there… [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Plaintiff, acting pro se in this appeal, challenged a federal district court's granting his former employer, the Syracuse Regional Airport Authority [SRAA], summary judgment in response to Plaintiff's allegations of unlawful discrimination and retaliation.The United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, noting that summary judgment is proper "only when, construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-movant'" and "there… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 8:34 am by Eric Goldman
Section 230(c)(1) The court starts by acknowledging that Section 230 should be construed broadly in favor of immunity. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]