Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 4,684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2010, 4:55 am
Burdick v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
V. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am
In New Breed of Patent Claim Bedevils Product Makers , DIONNE SEARCEY covered aspects of the false patent marking issue found in the Federal Circuit case Stauffer v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:05 pm
(For example, in Telecommunications Research & Action v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:15 pm
Bard, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
" United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:05 am
Allow for an impartial decision-maker to address unaccepted objections, see Chicago Teachers Union v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:41 pm
Summery but not so summary: EWCA (Civ) decision in trade mark infringement case Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein (IPKat) Nokia fakes case: silence over official submission (IPKat) UK’s Digital Economy Act hurts digital technology development (ipeg) United States US Patents Did the lack of software savvy patent attorneys cause a decline in patent quality? [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:14 pm
For example, Delaware’s Chancery Court has recently approved the maintenance of a dilutive shareholder rights plan triggered at an ownership threshold of 4.99% (see Selecteca v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:21 pm
The Court had previously rejected the attack on the statute itself by a couple of trouble makers in People v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 6:00 pm
Nafal v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 4:16 am
Cases considered included: R v IAT, ex p Bakhtaur Singh [1986] 1 WLR 910; Soering v UK [1989] 11 EHRR 439; Huang v SSHD [2007] UKHL 11; AS (Pakistan) v SSHD [2008] EWCA Civ 1118; EB (Kosovo) v SSHD [2008] UKHL 41; JO (Uganda) v SSHD [2010] EWCA Civ 10]. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
Click Here Owner of Fertilizer and Feed Supplement Maker in Fairbury, Neb., to Pay $30,000 Penalty for Violations of Clean Water Act. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:53 pm
Quoting a March, 2010 federal court opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
The New Jersey example proves that the act of withdrawing is futile (see New Jersey Bear Problem); despite the mammoth efforts to control city garbage, the state's bear problem is worse than ever! [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:35 am
What this means for policy makers, business people, and "netizens". [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:28 am
See Kendall v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am
United States (Patently-O) CAFC finds claim construction arguments waived on appeal: Enovsys LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:30 am
One option for enforcing a process claim against a distributor or maker of the software is to allege contributory infringement. [read post]
