Search for: "State v. May" Results 3741 - 3760 of 120,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:56 pm by Finch McCranie, LLP
United States, which the Court has not yet decided it will hear, provides the Court with an opportunity to revisit its holding in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:51 pm
No cause of action may be brought and no liability may be imposed under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:17 am by Louis M. Solomon
” Rather, “the question is, does a state-law claim necessarily raise a stated federal issue, actually disputed and substantial, which a federal forum may entertain without disturbing any congressionally approved balance of federal and state judicial responsibilities. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 3:16 pm
Virginia to affirm a communicating a threat conviction in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:50 am by Mark Bennett
(This, and the previous scenario, may be logically impossible; “not a watershed rule” and “not explicitly made retroactive” may be mutually exclusive. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”In Matter of D'Agostino v DiNapoli, 24 Misc 3d 1090, one of the relatively few State court decisions that consider the extent of the protections provided by Article V, §7 of New York State Constitution's, the court said that Article V, §7 “merely provides that retirement system benefits are contractual in nature and may not be impaired or diminished by state action. [read post]