Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 14,234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm
Grimm, No. 16-273) dealing with a different civil rights law, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which provides that in a school district receiving federal financial assistance, “[n]o person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, . . . be subjected to discrimination. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:45 pm
United States Automobile Association, No. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:32 am
The opinion at issue is Morrissey v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
In a 2017 concurring opinion in Hively v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:30 am
Justice Kavanaugh kept his cards pretty close to the vest. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:11 pm
United States held that if a defendant reacts to a priors ruling by staying off the witness stand, then he cannot appeal the rectitude of the priors ruling. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:17 am
Inslee, involving whether a state can require operators of state-subsidized home daycare centers to accept an exclusive bargaining agent to deal with the state on public-policy issues; Hall v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:14 am
United States of America v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation.Ramos v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
Barnette, No. 591, Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1942, at 46. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm
Friendly involvement by the OSG is a blessing to any Supreme Court advocate, and Schmidt is “very pleased to have the United States on the same side as Kansas” in all three cases. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
” It “literally sounds like a group that helps people exit the United States—not a group that helps people in the United States exit extremist hate groups. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
One of the most closely-watched cases is Kansas v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 11:39 am
This edited volume is part of a collaboration among law professors and others to rewrite, from a feminist perspective, key judicial decisions in the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:31 am
The Supreme Court made this clear in its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
