Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 4,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2010, 1:45 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidence Union Officer's Prior Bad Acts Admissible to Show Intent in Trial for Hobbs Act Extortion, Embezzlement United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:08 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:42 am
Interesting post at Persuasive Authorities on the implications of Holder v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:43 am
Thank you.Declaration of Copyright Self-Regulation of the Chinese Internet SectorIn order to safeguard copyright and related right holders' lawful rights and interest, stimulate the healthy development of the Internet industry, safeguard social and public interests, the representatives of the Internet sector make the following declaration of self-regulation to society:I, Internet enterprises shall undertake their obligations to society, earnestly respect and propagate State… [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm
United States and Bloate v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm
In Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:23 am
The long and short of this is that, if you are a foreign copyright holder and think you might ever want to sue in the United States for infringement, you should register your works with the USCO and keep those registrations up to date.Failure to do so could result in you being unable to claim all the damages you would otherwise be entitled to.To be clear though, lack of registration does not prohibit you from filing DMCA takedown notices nor does it prevent you from… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:36 am
This excerpt from their “about” page will give you the flavour: The United States remains a nation at war. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
—the largest provider of voting equipment systems in the United States—has agreed to settle an antitrust complaint filed by the U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:48 am
" Based upon that contract, plaintiff was not the exclusive copyright holder either in Poland or anywhere in the world where a copyright was held, including in the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
In Apache v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm
United States, Hardt, Rent-a-Center West v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 7:16 am
United States Fire Insurance Company, was decided in 1984, and states that insurance policies are strictly construed in favor of the insured to avoid excluding coverage. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:13 am
Holder Docket: 09-263 Issues: (1 )Whether this Court’s holding in INS v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:52 am
Muchnick "Copyright holder's failure to comply with 17 U.S.C. [read post]
