Search for: "United States v. Long"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 21,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2023, 12:00 am
Initial Hearing Procedure Master Robertson acting as application judge (Avli BRC Developments Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm
Or the defendant can be a foreigner who has never even set foot in the U.S., so long as an "act in furtherance" was committed within United States territory. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:41 am
When it comes to providing care to mesothelioma patients and protecting consumers from the risks of asbestos exposure, the United States lags significantly behind effort in the United Kingdom. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 12:12 pm
United States, 351 F.3d 1374, 1378 (Fed. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
This may not be as well-known to those who live out on the coasts, but the United States is currently suffering through a drought as bad as any we’ve seen in some time—United States Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack recently said it was “the most serious situation we’ve had in probably 25 years. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:34 am
United States, No. 09-5801, an equal protection challenge to the federal government’s disparate treatment of male and female U.S. citizens for purposes of establishing the citizenship of their children born overseas. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
It's possible that many of the lawmakers who voted against the proposal simply didn't want their state, with not even a million inhabitants, to take such a fundamental decision against two of the country's largest and most powerful companies.There definitely is broadbased political support for the fight against app store monopolies: last fall, the Democratic majority of the United States House of Representatives adopted a report on digital markets that… [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 2:31 pm
Paxton, and now United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 12:01 am
Rogers v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:50 am
Facts: This case (Jackson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 7:24 pm
United States, 2009 WL 1650585 (U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:07 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U.S. 449 (2007) (WRTL)] or [Citizens United v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently heard argument in Glossip v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 12:52 pm
General Observations About the Work Streams V. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 1:11 pm
United States, 308 US 343 (1939) ; United States v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:51 pm
“[I]t has long been held that a fiduciary is liable only if it had notice of the Claim of the United States before making the distribution. [read post]
