Search for: "United States v. Warne" Results 3741 - 3760 of 5,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 7:57 am by San Antonio Lawyer
  In fact, thousands of cases in the United States talk about whether a given scenario was a legal arrest or whether it was instead a voluntary conversation. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:02 pm by Schachtman
We are getting close to a quarter of a century since the United States Supreme Court outlined the requirements of gatekeeping, in Daubert v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Joe Consumer
And until Kiobel, corporations headquartered or doing business in the United States have always been liable, as well. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Joe Consumer
And until Kiobel, corporations headquartered or doing business in the United States have always been liable, as well. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:34 am by Susan Brenner
The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act makes it a crime to `intentionally access[ ] a computer without authorization or exceed[ ] authorized access, and thereby obtain[ ] information from any department or agency of the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:06 am by Charon QC
Before we look at the practical  legality of the United Kingdom government’s threats to Ecuador warning them about The Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act 1987 – I want to put a few myths to bed by stating the legal position rather than some of the more bizarre and irrational concepts / constructs  used by commentators and commenters  in the press and on twitter  1. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:32 am by Josh Blackman
Circuit Court of Appeals and chair of the Judicial Conference of the United States' budget committee. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 3:34 am by Kurt R. Karst
  Specifically, the statute would be amended to require NDA sponsors to: (i) certify to the Food and Drug Administration that the information described in subparagraph (B) that is submitted to the Secretary is complete and consistent with the information such sponsor or holder provided to the United States Patent and Trademark Office and any communications such sponsor or holder had with the United States Patent and Trademark Office; and (ii) (I) submit to… [read post]