Search for: "Victory v. State" Results 3741 - 3760 of 6,924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” Bill Mears reports for Fox News that the case “is part of a larger effort by red states to pass laws regulating abortion to test how supportive the new justices will be of precedents like Roe v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
O’Reilly’s “pay in lieu” As stated, Mr. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
On June 15, 2020, advocates of LGBTQ rights won a 6-3 Supreme Court victory in Bostock v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
The Press Gazette and Guardian describe the naming of Marandi as a victory for open justice. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The Bladensburg Peace CrossThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that a cross-shaped monument may be preserved on public land because it does not violate the Constitution's Establishment Clause.Cultural property watchers may not have noticed the case of American Legion et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:30 pm
The decision, dividing the Circuit Court 2 to 1, came in the case of Arar v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The US fair use provision states: …. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
To be clear, given the very light substantive burden that Justice Kavanaugh says that Alabama bears--showing merely that the plaintiffs' victory is not "entirely clearcut"--Merrill v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 12:13 pm by Larry Tolchinsky
For details on the standing argument, read about our recent victory against Bank of America on this issue in Barnett v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:09 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
However, given that the EEOC’s decision comes just weeks after the seminal gay-marriage victory in Obergefell v Hodges, courts may be more open to revisiting this issue and more generally the question of using courts, not the legislature, to advance LGB rights. [read post]