Search for: "Case v. Case"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 294,928
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German… [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:08 am
The Maryland case will be closely watched when it is decided as it relates to the more publicized gerrymandering case already heard by the Court back on October 3: Gill v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 1:52 pm
The US Supreme Court Monday granted certiorari to two cases, Reed v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:11 pm
In an important privacy judgment handed down on Friday 15 May 2020 in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg LP ([2020] EWCA 611) the Court of Appeal upheld Nicklin J’s finding that the publication of an article containing confidential information obtained from a UK law enforcement agency which was investigating a businessman was a misuse of private information. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:48 am
While the Court has taken a number of anti-employee stances, most notably in the Gross v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:58 am
We discussed this here in relation to an earlier case called CBB Group Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
The SCT has issued its opinion in Warger v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 12:46 pm
The US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments Wednesday in two cases: Knick v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 7:34 am
Lemmon v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
Maurer notes that in one case (U.S. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:43 am
The issue has divided lower federal and state courts, and the case of King v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 8:31 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 2:52 pm
Without comment in orders on Friday, at least four Justices granted the hearing request for two cases that will be consolidated for arguments: Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:14 pm
On 12 October 2010 the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights, presided over by English judge Sir Nicholas Bratza, gave judgment in the Article 10 case of Saaristo v Finland. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 9:15 am
The Supreme Court case of Nealy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
Corp. v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am
The Supreme Court decision The most significant case to be considered by the Court was Mucelli v Government of Albania [2009] 1 WLR 276, where the majority held that ‘notice of an appeal within the relevant permitted period’ meant that an appeal had to be both filed and served on all the respondents within such a period. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
For years, the controlling case with regard to § 285 of the Patent Act was Brooks Furniture Mfg., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:17 am
Here are all of the materials now in the case consolidated as Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of Colusa Indian Community v. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:02 pm
The full text of the adoption case mentioned before is now available at[tinyurl.com]The full title is as follows:In Re "Ann", an Infant: N. v. [read post]
