Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 12,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2018, 12:09 pm
L. c. 151. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 1:17 pm
b. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 4:15 pm
In the first titled information, the offenders were charged with (a) criminally buying and receiving stolen property, consisting of 4 cases of handkerchiefs valued at $68.40; (b) criminally concealing and withholding the said property; and (c) petit larceny involving those handkerchiefs. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 2:41 pm
§ 1300.71(a)(3)(B) (listing six subjective fee reasonableness factors to calculate reimbursement for services provided to HMO enrollees) and 28 C.C.R. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:12 pm
The Court of Appeals affirmed, as have other courts, that TwIqbal applies on a FRCP 12(c) motion on the pleadings just as it does on a FRCP 12(b)(6) motion. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 5:47 am
” --, using as an illustration the CIVIX-DDI patent matter:--In 2011, NAR negotiated a blanket licensing agreement with CIVIX-DDI LLC, a company that holds several patents on location-based Internet search techniques, after the company filed patent infringement lawsuits against two of the nation’s largest multiple listing services and demanded licensing fees from several others. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 6:31 pm
Code 23-18-9-1.1(c)). [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 7:41 am
More than $100 but less than $750: Class B misdemeanor that may be punished by up to six months in a county jail and a maximum fine of $2,000. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:33 pm
The False Claims Act provides that the government may settle an action with the defendant over the relator's objections "if the court determines, after a hearing, that the proposed settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances." 31 U.S.C. 3730(c)(2)(B). [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 4:15 pm
In the first titled information, the offenders were charged with (a) criminally buying and receiving stolen property, consisting of 4 cases of handkerchiefs valued at $68.40; (b) criminally concealing and withholding the said property; and (c) petit larceny involving those handkerchiefs. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:37 pm
The New York case of Travelers Indemnity Company, cited above, was decided in 1962. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:01 am
Corporate Governance, ESG and investors' practices c. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:36 pm
Can your company be liable for its AI being used in this way? [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:32 pm
You see employees advance this argument by claiming customers are fluid, switch companies with relative ease, or can be ascertained through public sources. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:08 am
The SEC’s litigation will be led by Kevin C. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:05 am
To be successful the petitioner must show:(A) that the petitioner expects to be a party to an action cognizable in this court but cannot presently bring it or cause it to be brought; (B) the subject matter of the expected action and the petitioner’s interest; (C) the facts that the petitioner wants to establish by the proposed testimony and the reasons to perpetuate it; (D) the names or a description of the persons whom the petitioner expects to be adverse parties and their… [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:56 am
At this point, the contraceptive mandate remains in effect for all employer health plans, except those that are grandfathered or non-grandfathered plans offered by (a) religious employers (e.g. churches); (b) certain religious nonprofit organizations; or (c) in light of the Hobby Lobby decision, for-profit "closely held" corporations that object to the mandate on religious grounds. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:50 pm
Plant protection products shall be considered identical to the reference products if: (a) they have been manufactured by the same company or by an associated undertaking or under license; (b) they are identical in specification and content; and (c) they are either the same or equivalent in the co-formulants present and the packaging size, material or form. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:06 pm
The EUIPO rejected the application due to lack of distinctiveness (Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR). [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
Justifications for free expression—and thus for the First Amendment’s prohibition on government action “abridging the freedom of speech”—fall into three broad categories: (a) furthering the autonomy and self-fulfillment of speakers; (b) enabling a “marketplace of ideas”—a legal and cultural regime of open communication—that benefits listeners; and (c) promoting democratic participation and checking government power. [read post]
