Search for: "In re P. F."
Results 3761 - 3780
of 4,148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Merrell challenged Swan’s unpublished, non-peer-reviewed re-analyses as not “generally accepted” under the Frye test. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 12:00 am
Defenses for Aggravated DUI If you’re facing this charge and legal issue, you will need an experienced and aggressive DUI defense attorney at your side to challenge the state’s evidence and protect your legal rights. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 7:49 am
We’re just 90 days into this, but we’re experiencing, we believe, a tailwind already just because of how many students didn’t pick up the phone because we were for-profit. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
In the last years before the American Revolution, Americans increasingly regarded not only houses but ships as castles.7 Arguing that all we’re doing is “mapping” meatspace to cyberspace is a red herring, “the purpose of which is to divert the audience from the truth or an item of significance. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
Hessel, John F. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
Bell P’s liberal approach was not followed by the majority. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Drilling Rig/Odessa, 761 F.2d 229,233 (5th Cir. 1985). [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:10 pm
Wife filed three OSC re Contempts against the Husband, including one in which the Court in August, 2006, ordered the parties to meet and confer in a 4-way, as to which Ken "refused to meet and confer if attorney Andrew G. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Among the important questions that will need to be answered in connection with the current wave of failed bank litigation is the question of extent to which the non-director officers will be able to defend themselves in reliance on the business judgment rule. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
“[P]ut most baldly,” remarked Justice Kagan at oral argument, “I think that the question that you [counsel for the plaintiffs] have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the United States. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
FCC, 750 F.2d 70, 79–80 (D.C. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
” 33 Cal.4th 1055, 1080, 17 Cal.Rptr.3d 225, 95 P.3d 459 (2004). [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:47 am
However, “[p]romotional activities designed to stimulate sales that will be made by someone else are not exempt outside sales work. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
., In re Welding Fume Prods. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
There is no dispute that Defendant's public interest as stated in Executive Order No. 141 was: "[F]or the purpose of protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the people of North Carolina … [S]lowing and controlling community spread of COVID-19 … [T]o lower the risk of contracting and transmitting COVID-19[.] [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:57 pm
(June 18, 2007hearing transcript, p. 667) . [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Res. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Res. [read post]
