Search for: "Michaels v State" Results 3761 - 3780 of 13,657
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2018, 10:27 am by Michael Livermore
Michael Livermore is professor of law at University of Virginia School of Law. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 9:23 am by Victoria Clark
Department of State called the lawsuit “baseless. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:53 am
"An excellent topic, well-explored on the NYT "Daily" podcast with Michael Barbaro. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Jeremy Wright MP has been appointed as Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport following Matt Hancock’s appointment as Health Secretary. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am by Mikhaila Fogel, Matthew Kahn
United States, Maurer identified an argument that the parties, the amici, and the court did not make. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 2:40 pm by Associated Press
Maryland House Speaker Michael Busch and Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Although “The Anthony Kennedy Show” has now been superseded by what will surely be an entertaining but entirely predictable renewal of “The Confirmation Show: Now Even More Evasive,” it is still valuable to consider Justice Kennedy’s hand in the Supreme Court’s hard-right turn that paid off so handsomely for conservative activists this year.In some ways, the most perversely interesting opinion that the Court’s Conservative Five handed down last month was in… [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:36 am by Steven Boutwell
By Michael J. deBarros In asbestos-related injury claims, some states, including Louisiana, base an insurer’s liability for defense and indemnity on the amount of time an insurer is “on the risk. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” Julie Rovner of Governing reports that many states are poised to ban abortion, if Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It would even be open to liberal red-state supreme courts to find a state constitutional right to abortion, at least pending recall or reversal by the voters.But now suppose the Supreme Court were to overrule Fisher v. [read post]