Search for: "Reiter v. Reiter" Results 3761 - 3780 of 6,279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2024, 4:57 pm by Dennis Crouch
The court reiterated that “the inability for the human mind to perform each claim step does not alone confer patentability,”  (quoting FairWarning IP, LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:06 am by Maria Roche
The Court reiterated that the three questions identified by the Court of Appeal in  R v Mortimer [2010] EWCA Crim 1303 must be addressed when making a SOPO: Is the making of an order necessary to protect from serious sexual harm through the commission of scheduled offences ? [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm by Matthew Flinn
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:01 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The court also reiterates that a plaintiff who argues she has not read and is not bound by terms cannot then complain about provisions in those terms. __ Ouch. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
(Privacy Shield is functionally an adequacy assurance, or an assurance that the U.S. provides an adequate level of protection for that data under Chapter V of the GDPR). [read post]