Search for: "S. Baker"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 13,508
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
The Supreme Court ‘s ruling was limited to the actions of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission in which it ruled against baker Jack Phillips. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court ruled in favor of a Christian baker who refused to make a cake for a same-sex wedding. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Campaign Finance Alabama: “John Merrill Questions Alabama Ethics Commission’s Waivers of Fines” by Mike Cason for AL.com Arizona: “Critics Slam Michele Reagan Over Election Funding Site ‘That Doesn’t Work’” by Dustin Gardiner for Arizona Republic Colorado: “Judge Dismisses Campaign Complaint Against Denver Council President, Saying State Law Doesn’t Apply to City” by Jon Murray for Denver Post Elections National:… [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Baker, the two-term Prince George’s County executive, and Jealous, the former national president of the NAACP, appear to be locked in ... [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:55 pm
In turn, Obergefell raised the issue of whether a cake baker could refuse to create a cake for a same-sex wedding based on the baker’s religious beliefs. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:55 pm
In turn, Obergefell raised the issue of whether a cake baker could refuse to create a cake for a same-sex wedding based on the baker’s religious beliefs. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:17 pm
Nick Weaver and David point to metadata as the fatal flaw in Wolfe's security — and to cloud backup as the fatal flaw in Manafort's (along with the problem that any secret shared with another is a hostage to that party's inclinations). [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:08 pm
In Masterpiece, the justices ruled in favor of Jack Phillips, a Colorado baker who refused to make a custom wedding cake for a same-sex couple because he believed that doing so would violate his religious beliefs. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:14 am
Lawfare’s Jim Baker will serve as moderator in the afternoon. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 7:19 am
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of June 11, 2018 from Wise Law on Twitter: US Supreme Court rules for Colorado baker who refused to make cake for gay weddingSupreme Court Sides With Baker Who Turned Away Gay Couple Can a president obstruct justice? [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court ruled in favor of a Christian baker who refused to make a cake for a same-sex wedding, “claiming the 7-2 ruling vindicates their positions in a range of ongoing cases. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:28 am
Arun Srivastava to head up the US firm's City regulatory and fintech and payments practice [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
Funk, an editor of Indiana Employment Law Letter and attorney with Faegre Baker Daniels LLP in Indianapolis, Indiana. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
Funk, an editor of Indiana Employment Law Letter and attorney with Faegre Baker Daniels LLP in Indianapolis, Indiana. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:06 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark case of Loving v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 5:50 am
Today’s Long Island civil rights blog discusses whether a baker can rightfully turn down a gay couple’s request to design their wedding cake if the baker’s religion does not accept gay marriage. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 5:24 am
Stewart Baker posted the latest episode of The Cyberlaw Podcast which covered the (expected and unexpected) implications of the General Data Protection Regulation, and more. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am
” Additional commentary comes from Counting to 5 (podcast) and from Kristin Waggoner at PoliZette, who asserts that “despite what some might say,” “other artists who share [the baker]’s religious beliefs about marriage will also benefit from the court’s decision. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:13 am
As many have noted, the path the court took toward ruling for the baker clearly reflected a compromise among justices with very different views. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy said that the baker “was entitled to a neutral decisionmaker who would give full and fair consideration to his religious objection,” and that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission was not neutral in its ruling against the baker. [read post]
