Search for: "State v. A. T. D."
Results 3761 - 3780
of 23,969
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 2:24 pm
(Hoffner v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:15 pm
Because that'd be terrible, precisely for the reasons I mentioned above.So, again, I get why the Court of Appeal comes out this way. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:57 pm
The Sixth Circuit's recent, and short, opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 6:44 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
It’s rare to see a child porn case challenged on the sufficiency of the evidence itself, but that was the situation in Wise v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 11:21 am
Kim v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 2:14 pm
Hendrick v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:41 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am
United States and Hughes v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner applied for a hearing and redetermination of his retirement benefits (see Retirement and Social Security Law §§ 74 [d]; 374 [d]). [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner applied for a hearing and redetermination of his retirement benefits (see Retirement and Social Security Law §§ 74 [d]; 374 [d]). [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 5:44 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
City of Chicago (1) agreed with the panel that the Second Amendment was indeed applicable to state and local governments, and (2) did not opine on the scope of the “sensitive places” exception, I’d expect that the Ninth Circuit panel would just reaffirm its original decision. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:33 am
Div. 2006); see also State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
The Ohio Supreme Court recognized that 30 years ago in State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 1:26 pm
Supp. 1465, 1484 (D. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:30 pm
Related Cases: State of Maryland v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:13 am
I agree, but I’d have loved to see more discussion beyond a cryptic citation to Playboy v. [read post]
