Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2017, 8:07 am
District Court for the District of Maryland issued an opinion and an order enjoining the implementation of President Trump’s latest travel ban. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
First, she found troubling the volume of governmental tracking permissible under current tests, which the Sixth Circuit earlier seemed concerned with in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am
As he himself acknowledges, he’s hardly the first to make the suggestion; there’s a rather substantial library of academic commentary on “innumeracy” at the court (and, more generally, throughout the judiciary). [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:10 am
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] I was honored to serve on the Committee from 2006-2012. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 2:23 pm
First, we determine whether the claims at issue are "directed to" a judicial exception, such as an abstract idea. 134 S. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:15 am
The Court agreed with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals’ rationale in Smith v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 7:45 am
The state supreme court first recognized the concurrent jurisdiction of state courts and the bankruptcy courts to address the dischargeability of debts, in accordance with the original, but not exclusive, grant of bankruptcy jurisdiction to the federal district courts in 28 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
With a deadlock in district court, the Davis case would head automatically to the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
So the Ohio high court first had to decide if the state constitutional challenge was properly before it. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:09 am
The case is Byrd v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:07 am
In August, a federal panel of judges in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted the 18 states standing to contest the non-payments in a case called House v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
In a published opinion filed September 28, 2017, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment denying appellant Living Rivers Council’s (LRC) writ petition challenging the State Water Resources Control Board’s (the “SWRCB” or “Board”) approval of a policy designed to maintain instream flows in coastal streams north of San Francisco. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
In a published opinion filed September 28, 2017, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment denying appellant Living Rivers Council’s (LRC) writ petition challenging the State Water Resources Control Board’s (the “SWRCB” or “Board”) approval of a policy designed to maintain instream flows in coastal streams north of San Francisco. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
The court transferred the case to the Northern District of California. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:37 am
[v] The Manual would serve as an excellent policy model for state prosecutors to adopt. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Affirming the trial court, the First District Court of Appeal held that the petitioners failed to provide substantial evidence of a fair argument of a reasonable possibility of a significant environmental effect as a result of the stated unusual circumstance. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Affirming the trial court, the First District Court of Appeal held that the petitioners failed to provide substantial evidence of a fair argument of a reasonable possibility of a significant environmental effect as a result of the stated unusual circumstance. [read post]
