Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2015, 11:01 am
The ruling came in Lenz v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm
On appeal, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed that the copyright claim was not strong, but nonetheless ordered Google to take down all copies of the video. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:07 am
“This report is a strong endorsement of the legal theories in our case, First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
” It was good enough for “separate but equal” segregation in many states up to the Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am
The first case on the agenda is Kelly v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:26 am
The case is Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:25 pm
See Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 11:53 am
Cuevas v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:00 am
But that reference doesn’t tell us much: the Court in Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook ignored the state of the art and real-world operations of “automated search tools and technologies tools” and underestimated how screening efforts by platforms could easily become excessive, undermining users’ fundamental rights. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 am
Supreme Court issued a 5-4 ruling in Florida v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
See Homestore, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:30 am
Somin has long been a champion of strong property rights. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:14 am
Supreme Court has already ruled in Riley v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 8:07 am
Benefiting from an intervening Supreme Court ruling decided in 2015, Young v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:01 pm
And if you want a deep dive on the issue, you should read my friend Chris Sager’s outstanding book “United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:05 pm
Times, Ronald Collins/Concurring Opinions, video from Baca v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
Div. 1957), Innes v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:33 pm
I myself am not entirely convinced that this context is enough to overcome the strong presumption that courts are usually supposed to interpret words in accordance with ordinary meaning. [read post]
