Search for: "U. S. v. Mays" Results 3761 - 3780 of 7,542
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am by Arthur F. Coon
It is clear from OPR’s explanation of the proposal that “the analysis of energy impacts may need to extend beyond building code compliance. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Get lost, German copyright bods told http://t.co/ooTEXzAaVw -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-09-27 http://t.co/6Ps7yfV0jP -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-09-27: Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-09-26 htt… http://t.co/ViBZhJh4Fk -> Very sad to hear that Jackie Hushion of the Canadian Publishers' Council passed away last night -> Recent French Ruling on the Protection of Slogans -> US gov’t: Kim Dotcom paid pirates $3M for movies, should… [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:59 am by Jeremy Saland
 However, “[u]nless speech presents a clear and present danger of some serious substantive evil, it may neither be forbidden nor penalized” (People v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
(and other) demands for its production, and also to enact laws requiring certain data to be held locally, creating a form of reciprocal pressure.[5]  In this environment, the same action in response to a surveillance directive may be at once both legally required by one government’s laws, and legally forbidden by another’s. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 6:43 am
Dozal–Bencomo, supra (recognizing that subjective entrapment may only be found as a matter of law where the relevant facts are uncontradicted).State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
They may also provide me with more information about the representation, in which case we may ask you to withdraw the subpoena. [read post]