Search for: "U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 7,045
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2017, 8:44 am
The U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:48 am
Background Last summer, the 7th Circuit held—somewhat begrudgingly—that the prohibition on sex discrimination in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not extend to sexual orientation. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:52 am
I have been rather critical in the past of the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR)—the intermediate appellate court Congress created in 2006 to sit between the Guantánamo military commissions and the U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:52 am
In an 8-to-3 decision, the full U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:01 pm
The Times notes that the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:15 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission at five consecutive conferences without acting on it. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:11 am
U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 5:22 am
Andrew Erickson of the U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 16-111. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:49 am
Ochoa was fired by McLane but then filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging that McLane violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:49 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission 16-111 Issue: Whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the petitioner to create expression that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage violates the free speech or free exercise clauses of the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
At the same time, the SEC wanted an outside contractor to process the data in order to facilitate the Commission’s oversight. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:50 am
The Congressional-Executive Commission on China was created by the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:48 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, a case filed by a Colorado man with religious objections to creating a cake for a same-sex wedding celebration, questioning whether it is “legally justifiable to subordinate sincerely held and constitutionally protected religious beliefs to a same sex couple’s statutory rights when the discrimination undoubtedly creates at least psychic or dignitary harm to the couple, but is devoid of any economic impact on them, and… [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:09 pm
The existence of this type of circuit split is precisely the kind of thing that can, if teed up the right way in a particular case, attract the attention of the U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:06 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, a case filed by a Colorado man with religious objections to creating a cake for a same-sex wedding celebration. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am
Prosecution team member Robert Swann calls an unnamed U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
For starters, that would violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
For starters, that would violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
