Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 14,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The state of Michigan has demanded that a Canadian company, Enbridge Energy Company (Enbridge), close the portion permitted by an easement of its oil pipeline—Line 5—that crosses the Straits of Mackinac, which joins Lake Michigan and Lake Huron. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 9:01 am
, United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:48 pm
We’re talking about the jurisdiction of the United States as well. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
United States, 603 U.S. ____ (2024), the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:40 am
Kenexa Brassring, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:42 am
United States, which Matt Danzer summarizes here, offers more guidance on the First Amendment and terrorism than Ben and the always-thoughtful Marty Lederman have suggested. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:35 pm
First up was Byrd v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 7:10 am
United States, No. 1:17-cv-2487 (KBJ) (D.D.C. 2019) (memorandum opinion) Guam v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:30 am
Justice Kavanaugh kept his cards pretty close to the vest. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
Such was the case in Kerson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:06 am
United States (here). [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:26 am
"The Supreme Court has stated that: The authority of the United States to search the baggage of arriving international travelers is based on its inherent sovereign authority to protect its territorial integrity. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
The COA did, in fact, foreclose on the unit. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 5:44 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:32 pm
In today's Austin v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:30 pm
The United States Supreme Court today rewrote an old classic. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:19 pm
This kind of violation was alleged in United States v. [read post]
