Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 3761 - 3780 of 10,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2017, 3:49 am by Miquel Montañá
As explained in paragraph 42 of this judgment, in paragraph 37 of Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2005] RPC 9, Lord Hoffmann explained that the doctrine of equivalents had been developed in the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
Comer, in which the court struck down a state ban on public funding for improvements to a church’s preschool playground, could “pave the way for more charter schools operated by religious groups, including churches,” which “would mark a significant change in several states. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am by Liz Williams
One significant source of uncertainty is that minimum unit pricing may encourage retailers to purchase cheaper products due to the mark-up. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm by Series of Essays
The death of late Justice Antonin Scalia last term created uncertainty for Court-watchers and may well have affected the outcome in a number of key cases—including United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm by Brian Shiffrin
  CPL 240.20(1)(h) requires the prosecutor disclose "Anything required to be disclosed, prior to trial, to the defendant by the prosecutor, pursuant to the constitution of this state or of the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:44 pm
United States, 110 S.Ct 668 (1990)). [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
” The Constitution provides that the president, like the vice president and all civil officers of the United States, “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:38 am
Accepting an agreement reached by the parties, the TTAB found that applicant Frasca Food and Wine (FFW) is entitled to a concurrent use registration for the mark FRASCA for bar and restaurant services, covering the entire United States except for the states of Illinois, Indiana, and Michigan. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 7:36 am by Steven Cohen
Conclusion:  The United States district court’s exclusion of expert witness testimony of Mark Ezra is affirmed. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 12:16 am
 In 2016 they filed and international trade mark (IR) designating the EU and other territories. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
The Cassinelli Decision California’s Marriage of Cassinelli (2016) 4 CA5th 1285, 210 CR3d 311, a decision reached by our own Fourth Appellate District, Division Two in Riverside, is now published and citable per California’s Judicial Council (but note that a Petition for Certiorari is presently docketed with the United States Supreme Court). [read post]