Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 6,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2012, 8:57 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 10:51 am
To date the ERA hasn't yet been published as valid by the Archivist of the United States, whose statutory duty it would be; nor is the second Trump Administration likely to recognize it as valid. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:40 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The minority in Kay would, in a nutshell, have made gateway (b) somewhat wider (Lord Bingham's not quite so famous [39]). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The minority in Kay would, in a nutshell, have made gateway (b) somewhat wider (Lord Bingham's not quite so famous [39]). [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
This generalization is true not just for companies in the United States but for all companies around the world. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
United States, a case involving the “anti-harboring” provision in Alabama’s 2011 immigration law, which made it a crime to help undocumented immigrants enter or live in the state. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/07/11/10-50240.pdf United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 10:17 am
There was much argument around the claim because the claim just stated the name of the enantiomer, just as some claims merely state the name of the virus or gene or protein. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Existing democracies are fragile.[3] That includes the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/02/28/08-56349.pdf United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
In 1987, Marshall was the deciding vote for the 5-4 majority in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 5:57 am
The judge noted that while the 4th Amendment usually does not “apply to searches by foreign authorities in their own countries, even if the targets . . . are American citizens”, an exception applies “when the participation of United States agents in the investigation is so substantial that the action is a joint venture between the United States and foreign officials. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:02 pm
Koh's upcoming FTC v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am
Of last week’s 16 relists, the court dumped nearly half, including United States Forest Service v. [read post]
