Search for: "York v York"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 52,973
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
City of New York, 795 F.3d 297 (2d Cir. 2015), and Vega v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 7:48 pm
One such case is Madarash v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:49 pm
The Second Circuit ruled today in Edwardo v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:00 am
” Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 7:41 am
The landmark case of Matter of Debra H. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
., v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
., v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am
” “Here, even if the defendant had been negligent in his representation of the plaintiff in connection with the underlying matters, viewing the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88), it failed to plead specific factual allegations demonstrating that, but for the defendant’s alleged negligence, there would have been a more favorable outcome in the underlying matters or that the plaintiff would not have incurred any… [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONMatter of S. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 4:25 am
Moreno v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 4:01 am
The Postnup, which was made in New York and is governed by New York law, reflects the parties’ express intent to implement an equal division of marital property upon the happening of certain “Operative Events” including written notice of intent to separate. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
New York argued. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm
For example, a university taking and announcing a position on the (contested) issue of how easy it should be for foreign graduate students to obtain visas (something that distinctively affects the university itself—and not just its population—as an institution) seems very different to us than weighing in on the correctness of last year’s Second Amendment ruling by the Supreme Court ruling striking down New York’s public-carry law or the Court’s Dobbs ruling… [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 4:30 pm
’” And in commentary, online at Vox, Ian Millhiser has an essay titled “The Supreme Court takes up a messy, chaotic case about religion in the workplace; Groff v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 11:10 am
The appellate court agreed and in Ameziani v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 5:03 pm
Without reaching trial or a verdict, the Dominion Voting Systems v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
