Search for: "*king v. U. S"
Results 361 - 380
of 575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Grinberg, 2012 NY Slip Op 51580(U) (Sup Ct Kings County Aug. 17, 2012). [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 7:16 am
Slip Op. 50406(U) (Nassau County, 1st Dist., March 6, 2009); Clinton Realty, LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:14 am
In this case , Romano v Ficchi , 2009 NY Slip Op 51011(U) , Decided on May 22, 2009 , Supreme Court, Kings County , Rivera, J. plaintiff sought to buy a condo with a view. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:00 am
Zacharakos, 2012 NY Slip Op 50947(U) (Sup Ct Kings County May 24, 2012), turning down a bid by a disappointed shareholder to require equal participation in the purchase of a departing shareholder's shares. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 3:44 am
Some answers are found in Schlissel v Subramanian ;2009 NY Slip Op 52188(U) ; Decided on October 26, 2009 ; Supreme Court, Kings County ; Demarest, J. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:34 am
A Tortured Litigation Path In Matter of Rozof v Rozof, 2023 NY Slip Op 33125(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County Aug. 31, 2023]), Mark, Linda, and Judith first sued in 2016 in Nassau County Supreme Court for judicial supervision of the winding up of 391 1st Street Company following the death in 2011 of one general partner, their mother, Edna, and following the withdrawal of another general partner, Judith, just days before they commenced their lawsuit. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 6:15 am
The U. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Plaintiff commenced this personal injury action against the New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), the vehicle's titled owner and lessor, the vehicle's driver, and the vehicle's registered owner, American Transit, Inc. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Rennert v S.M.R. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
U. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Subramanian, 2009 NY Slip Op 52188(U) (Sup Ct Kings County Oct. 26, 2009), decided by Kings County Commercial Division Justice Carolyn E. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
” U. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:57 pm
A pleading that simply avers the substantive elements of inequitable conduct, without setting forth the particularized factual bases for the allegation, does not satisfy Rule 9(b).3 See King Auto., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
S. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
Kings 2016); C.G. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
King Construction Co. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am
“Grammatical Irregularities” Don’t Govern Operating Agreement’s Capital Call Provision Chen v 697 Dekalb LLC, 2022 NY Slip Op 32418(U) [Sup Ct Kings County July 18, 2022]. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 8:54 am
The complaint lists the following retail outlets as defendants: LA View, VIP Connection, Stand Out, Plush AKA Club Unisex Clothing, Players 96, Buba Fashion, Diva Fashion, Mufy Fashion, Guvi Outlet, Lizz's Closet, Styles 4 U, Allure Clothing, King of Music and Fashion, Allure Clothing, and Attitude. [read post]
